Giving consent for President of Georgia Salome Zurabishvili to visit abroad is like leaving an iron on at home or giving matches to a child, stated the leader of the “Power of the People” party, Guram Macharashvili.
In a recent statement, Macharashvili compared giving permission for President Zurabishvili to travel abroad to irresponsible actions that could lead to disastrous consequences. He emphasized that the President’s foreign visits have not brought any tangible benefits to the country and have only resulted in unnecessary expenses for the taxpayers.
Macharashvili’s comments come at a time when the Georgian government is facing criticism for its excessive spending on foreign trips. According to a report by the State Audit Office, the President’s office spent over 2.5 million GEL (approximately $850,000 USD) on foreign visits in 2019 alone. This amount is almost double the budget allocated for the President’s office for the same year.
The leader of the “Power of the People” party also pointed out that President Zurabishvili’s foreign visits have not yielded any significant diplomatic achievements. He argued that instead of focusing on improving the country’s economy and addressing domestic issues, the President is more interested in traveling abroad and attending international events.
Macharashvili’s criticism of the President’s foreign visits has sparked a debate among the Georgian public. While some agree with his views and believe that the President should prioritize domestic issues, others argue that foreign visits are necessary for maintaining good relations with other countries and attracting foreign investments.
However, Macharashvili’s comparison of giving consent for the President’s foreign visits to leaving an iron on at home or giving matches to a child is a powerful metaphor that highlights the potential risks and consequences of such actions. Just like leaving an iron on at home can lead to a fire, giving permission for the President to travel abroad without any tangible benefits can have negative consequences for the country.
Moreover, Macharashvili’s statement also sheds light on the issue of accountability and responsibility. As the leader of the country, it is the President’s duty to prioritize the needs and interests of the citizens. By constantly traveling abroad and neglecting domestic issues, the President is failing to fulfill her responsibilities towards the people of Georgia.
In conclusion, Guram Macharashvili’s comparison of giving consent for President Zurabishvili’s foreign visits to leaving an iron on at home or giving matches to a child is a powerful statement that highlights the potential risks and consequences of such actions. It also raises important questions about the President’s priorities and responsibilities towards the citizens of Georgia. It is crucial for the government to address these concerns and ensure that the President’s foreign visits bring tangible benefits to the country and its people.
